The Policeman's Blog

But you sound like if you were that bloke you would spend your money on heating and your kids then life isn't such a ball
 

It isn't just the scrotes. A friend of mine's sister was complaining that she couldn't afford shows for her daughter. Tact forced us to refrain from pointing out the new 40' TV. And this is from a gainfully employed woman...
 

Life 'isn't such a ball' if you spend you money on heating and your kids?
No, you're right. Let's all piss our dough up the wall on computer games... then we'll all be happy, won't we?
 

I once tried to point out to a "Mother" that if she hadnt bought half the stuff in her house her kids wouldn't have to play with dirty nappies for fun.

Unfortunately i ran into what i now term the "Comprehension Gap." It seems that no matter how i tried i could not get her to understand that a 42" Plasma TV connected to a ridiculous number of speakers and amps was not a necessity and this was a few years ago when Plasma screens that big were four times the the still huge price they are now and that's bad enough.

Its not that she didn't want to understand, i could see her trying, but she just couldn't.

Anyway after a little conflab with my partner we just took the kids into Police Protective Custody.

Social Services supported us initially but with 48hours they were back at home. THe Council had paid for a deep cleaning team to come around and the social services had supported her as a fit parent. Apparently raising three kids with only her partner for help and having no free time despite being unemployed is a social problem we all need to tackle.........

It was not the first time the kids were taken by us, not the first time they were given back as well.

How is it that a Judge can ban someone from keeping animals if they mistreat them but any arsehole in the world can have kids despite having mistreated the ones they have.
 

Job photographer; twenty years in.
I've lost count of the number of addresses I've been to like this. Solution? Scrap the dole, adopt ration books like in WWII. Instead of giving the underclass cash to spend on fags and Nintendos, give them weekly vouchers for fresh food.
Or simply give the contract to Gregg's Bakers and everybody's happy...
 

Q: Should the State step in to rescue kids who are living in dreadful conditions?

A: Aww, poor little mites! Of course they should be helped, so that they can turn into productive members of society like theatre directors or pet therapists.

*****************************

Q: So, do you want to look after those kids?

A: Oooh, I'd love to, but Jocasta and I have such a busy dinner party schedule that it wouldn't be fair on them.

*****************************

Q: Should the state forcibly prevent the parents of rescued children from spawning more offspring?

A: You monster! You are a thousand times worse than Hitler.
 

You have to understand the benefits system to realise how well off it is possible to be. The chances, are everyone of those children has behavioural problems on one kind or another, and are thus easily diagnosed with various conditions. These facilitate significant benefit top ups, that where designed to help parents with handicapped children. We are not talking about small amounts of money here, but about £4,000pa per child *extra*.
 

Neuter the lot of them, take the kids away and let wiling adoptive parents look after them (hopefully give the kids some chance of a decent life. Then stop their dole, social security monies and force them into work, if they refuse to work they dont get any money, they cant pay their rent and buy their drugs and plasma screens. National Service wouldnt be a bad idea give the low lifes 2 weeks training and send them to Afghanistan or Iraq... Simple
 

D I see where yor coming from, the first 5 years I spent in the job was dealing with toe-rags who had a better standard of living than I did, newer cars, you can afford them when you dont tax and insure them, and newer electrical goods. Don't dispair, after a few years the mortgage takes less of your wages and things start to build up, now its a four bedroom house in a nice area with loads of equity and two new(ish) cars on the drive, keep banging away and it will come.
The people you describe have the horror of living amongst people just like themselves, we have the pleasure of kicking their doors in at 5am and dragging them out of bed. There "wives" are normally ugly and smelly too. They have a miserable existance and will probably die early from alcoholism or drug usage.
 

>They have a miserable existance and will probably die early from alcoholism or drug usage.

...leaving a horde of feral offspring who will demonstrably repeat the cycle, earlier and more often than those of us stupid enough to pay our own way.

I say 'stupid' advisedly. When you cut to the heart of it, the only meaningful measure of evolutionary fitness is the number of surviving offspring. By that measure, the welfare state has turned those who contribute least to society into the most 'fit' to survive.

We are quite literally breeding ourselves dumberer. The only questions are: how quickly will the parasite-aristocracy increase their numbers, and what happens when we reach the inflection point where the burden of supporting them becomes too much for the last remaining workers?

When we finally can't afford to give them handouts any longer, will they simply take whatever they want, and more importantly, who will be left to stop them?
 

Very good point Rogerborg.
Except they already take what they want and there are not enough people willing or able to stop them. Or enough prison spaces available when they do. Factor in mass, unchecked immigration and the tipping point accelerates ever closer.
Bring back 'Prison Ships' and incorporate a cruise which faithfully recreates the maiden voyage of the Titanic.

Give my regards to Bjorn
 

The Underclass:
In the old days, the plague, starvation or mass warfare would take many of them and the rope or transportation took care of the rest.

Now we feed their addiction with tax money and give 'em tickets they can't pay when they steal and riot.

You couldn't make it up!
 

And their teeth go all rotten and fall out cos they can't afford a dentist and there are no NHS ones left (not in the South anyway). When they get old their kids abuse them and steal their pension money, and inflict the same misery on them they inflicted on us, come on folks every cloud has a silver lining. I'm happy cos I'm just going into two rest days and my life is so much better than theirs.
 

"And their teeth go all rotten and fall out cos they can't afford a dentist and there are no NHS ones left (not in the South anyway)."
You make the presumption that if they HAD an NHS dentist they would use it. It's not about dentistry, for most of these people it's about simply not caring. You can see it in the build up of that white scuzzy crap around the gum line, the deeply stained stumps of teeth jutting out all over the place. No, availability of a dentist plays a minor role, these people simply don't have a toothbrush or toothpaste, or the will to spend two minutes twice a day cleaning them. They'd probably have a fit at he prospect of flossing or using mouthwash!
Sorry, the teeth and oral hygiene are one of the things that always scream "underclass!" to me.
 

Too many people think it's their RIGHT to have the plasma television, games console, DVDs, mobile phone, "trendy" clothing (matter of opinion but still expensive), smoke, drink etc etc etc.
I suggested to a "client" recently that she cancelled her Sky subscription to save a bit of money. She looked at me like I'd asked her to sell her kids.
I have to agree with Rogerborg, the cycle is just going to continue. And we all know who breeds the quickest.
It takes an incredibly strong willed child to break out of this cycle, especially when they rarely know any different.
 

A voucher system for benefits sounds like a good idea.
If you can afford a car and sky+ on benefits they you are getting too much money.
 

As a benefit fraud investigator I know all too well the type of families and their living conditions. I am now seeing foul mouthed single parents and work- shy customers (we can't call them claimants) who were screaming in their pushchairs whilst I interviewed their parents 20+ years ago. I recall my horror at a small child demanding 'where's my Mum's f***ing giro' as I interviwed the parent. They all too often have several children by different fathers who pay no maintenance. They feel that a 'deprived childhood' means a lack of the latest trainers/Wii/computer games/plasma TV & DVD in each bedroom. Said child is often fed on the cheapest processed food with little or no fresh fruit or vegetables. The parent(s)usually smoke and have at least one large dog that requires its own body weight in food each week. The dog is often better cared for than the children. This cycle shows no sign of being broken. I work in an area of very low unemployment but many of these people are unemployable. I don't know the answer to this problem but I can't see it changing anytime soon.
 

Anonymous said 'I don't know the answer to this problem..'

Blast off and nuke them from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
 

1966 Peckham (SE London) the parents, unemployed living in victorian house since demolished are in front of the court for neglect of their two sons ages 8 & 10. Woman Police Sergeant tells the Court of the state of the house; fireplaces used as lavatories, urine stained mattresses, dog shit on the floor, no food in the house, dirty dishes piled in the kitchen and bathroom sinks. Then she states that "the walls were smeared with excreta" at this point angry father interjects "Oh no it wasn't. It was HP sauce 'cos I broke a bit off and tasted it". Nothing changes does it.
 

No nothing changes, much. The poorest still live in squalor so that those higher up the ladder can feel so much better about themselves.
Yes it is about time cannabis was legal and SKUNK got rid of. People should be able to grow their own beneficial herb, which is less harmful than booze.
If the dad in the above story is the "problem" WHY punish the kids by taking them off their mother?
That strikes me as rather arrogant. Living like that may not be ideal, but it is love that counts the most in a childs life. Social workers are not the solution and often CAUSE more trouble than do good. Fact.
 

Very well written and we have all been to the same places. It is what makes us so hardened to the underclass. At least they can watch the Jeremy Kyle show in 6 foot multicolour and may learn something! Who needs education anyway.
 

Whoever posted about 'success' just being breeding the most has it bang on the nail. These people are more successful than most of you reading this blog, on the only scale that counts.

And unless you are willing to either i) sterilise by force or ii) let the children die, nothing will improve.

I don't like either solution, but that is what it takes. So, in the meantime, look after your own, and get prepared for the dictatorship that will eventually have to arise to cope with the scumderclass.....
 

"If the dad in the above story is the "problem" WHY punish the kids by taking them off their mother?"

Because the mother has put the kids in this position too. Because the mother isn't able to see that kids being cold, hungry & filthy is neglect. Because the mother condones the way the father chooses to fund their 'lifestyle', & she is as negative an influence on their lives as he is.

It certainly isn't the worst example, but the most recent:
We recently attended a flat which was relatively clean, usual gadgets-a-plenty (not a toy to be seen) & was certainly warm (like a furnace). But the fog of cigarette smoke was choking, & the young kids had to sit there listening to their foul-mouthed mother haranguing us about a complaint over an issue that was an unsuitable subject for children. Her latest boyfriend sat silently, patently too scared to intervene (or leave!). When I suggested that she might want to put her kids in another room while we 'discussed' the matter, she went off on another expletive-laden shouted tirade, which ended with 'why should I?'. When I could finally get a word in, I ventured 'Because you're obviously upset, & the subject & your language isn't really appropriate for their ears'.
'Don't you tell me how to look after my babies, I know what's best for them'.
Quite, you've made that quite clear. You're also obviously teaching them a life-lesson in how to deal with all the agencies you encounter - swear, shout, & act like a petulant 5 year old.
I spoke to Social Services about the family, & surprisingly they had known her since she was a child. So it goes.
 

"Living like that may not be ideal, but it is love that counts the most in a childs life. "

You can see the prospect of a lot of love in these children's lives, can you..?

Doesn't love mean paying the heating bills and not letting your children live in sqalour..?
 

Two serious questions here.

First: how much of all this is funded by benefits, how much by crime and/or cash-in-hand work?

Second: do these people vote, and if so, which way?
(I've done some poitical canvassing in my time, and when we found people like this, we'd usually assume they'd fail to get to the polling station, so we'd ignore them.)
 

Can't believe that no cops on this blog have mentioned the correlation between the obscene amounts of money given to the underclass in benefits, and our insulting and derisory pay deal. Doesn't matter if the cops are unhappy, buts lets not upset the scum. Problem is there's more underclass vote than cop's, so lets not rock the boat. Unbelievable.
 

I read lots of blogs and this subject frequently comes up. I appreciae that we all need a place to safely mouth off about these issues but surely there is enough evidence to justify a complete overhaul of the situation.

Where can we go for a sensible informed debate about the options and moving forward...

In a nutshell it seems to me that if we:
1) Remove benefits from able bodied people.
2) Alter child benefit and carers benefit so those in need get what they need ( as ration books if necessary.)

There will be a huge social fallout from this. Crime will increase, more police and prisons will be needed.
Children will suffer because the money is not coming in. (yes I know the are suffering now.)

To turn it around you need to be able to deal with the consequences.

Many of these people are unemployable. Would you want to employ these effin women?

National service...we would require training camps, trainers, facilities etc and we need to think about what happens after national service.

Acknowledge the problems but how can we work together to create a sensible thought out solution rather than a government panic reaction.
 

7 kids at the age of 22? Yeah right. You are making it up just for effect, so that you can have a spiteful and resentful little rant.
You and people like you appear to make a lot of assumptions about other people and their lives. For all you know their family may have provided the toys, the telly etc and the leather sofa. They most certainly would not have been able to afford them on just dole money.

People seem to overlook the fact that ABUSE in all its forms often drives people to use alcohol and drugs to gain some sort of relief from the mental pain. Yes cannabis is illegal, BUT it does LESS harm than alcohol.

It is very arrogant of authority to set in motion, steps to remove kids from loving parents and place them "in care", which is NO guarantee of "parental" love. It would be better and a great deal cheaper to give the family PROPER support workers, to try to inject some positivity into their lives.

I assume that the parents bedroom and bedding was equally damp and the room unheated. This is quite common in older type council houses. The government, past and present do not have a problem with exposing the children of the poor to toxic pollution from a variety of sources and industries. I don't hear anyone saying how awful that is and taking steps to remove those kids from a harmful environment. Oh no, they just find experts to say that "there is no proof" that the toxic pollution damages people's health, and also target anyone who tries to stop the pollution of their environment!
HYPOCRISY AND DOUBLE STANDARDS, AGAIN!
 

When we finally can't afford to give them handouts any longer, will they simply take whatever they want, and more importantly, who will be left to stop them?

Who will be left to stop them? I guarantee you, if that ever did happen, the police would act to help them, not stop them. Because here's what would happen - the savages would rise up and spark a wave of violence so vicious and so dangerous you would see people banding together to provide a common defence against it. And then the police would act to smash the common defence either because they want their monopoly dammit the public can just go to hell, or because their masters (who aren't us) expect them to smash the potential threat to their power.

We can look forward to being brutalized by both the underclass and the police acting in concert against us. Like the present situation times 100.
 

its crap like this thats annoys me - who are you to be judge and jury and indeed executioner..not everyone has the been of school had an education and good housekeeping - life skills etc life just sucks for some but thank you I now know that GOD wears a police uniform and drives a high performance police car equally paid for from my taxes !!!!!
 

Anonymous at 11.32PM, dont attempt to make me laugh.
"Your taxes" - my left thunga!
 

No such luck that we have GOD walking on earth and wearing a police uniform. If SHE did then she would have kicked a great many arrogant male arses by now. Not only that she would have well and truly sorted out this USELESS government, BOTH major parties; And, she would have stopped all the pollution that is going on from all forms of transport and industry.
Having read an article in Saturday's Daily Mail about TOXIC AIRLINES, somebody should set the Social Services on to them about exposing children to harmful substances....much more harmful than the "cloud of class C" the unenlightened cop considers justification for taking kids from their mother. Time it was legal and that TOXIC POLLUTION FROM FUEL ETC WAS BANNED.
Government and the system needs to get its priorities straight.
 

There is a film on Sky (and don't tell me you never watch the telly) called IDIOCRACY. Now its a crap film but the opening sequence is of the breeding frequency of a middle class couple and a family of scrotes
It goes on to posit the situation that the scrotes take over the World so we had all better watch out
 

The vociferous Anonymous seems to be one of an increasing number of pot-heads who cling to the "cannabis is harmless" mantra. If the endless queue of whey-faced, stoned hoodies I book in to custody are anything to go by, cannabis reduces intellect to almost amoeba like levels. Harmless it is not. Scientific research has found increasing links between its use and serious psychological damage.
 

Benefit Fraud. I am all in favour of tackling benefit fraud. Lets start where we can make the biggest savings. The biggest housing benefit scam of all is the Royal Apartments. These extremely high value properties supposedly belong to we the public, but are leased to Her Unelected Majesty The Queen's Hangers On for token rents like £10 per year. Why should we expect higher levels of honesty and integrity from the 'lower' classes than we get from the 'upper' classes?
Britains Social security benefits for the poorest people are the lowest in Western Europe. But the poorest people make the softest targets for cowards.
---
One of the strongest arguments against putting more people in prison is that we already have a greater percentage of our population in prison than any other country in Western Europe - about 6 times as many as in West Germany where the crime rate is far lower. With our number of CCTV cameras, and the number of agencies allowed to bug us, we are the most watched nation in the world. The uncomfortable truth is that the crime rate is much more closely related to the distribution of wealth. As the gap between rich and poor widens, the crime rate increases. You can see the correlation between that in every free country in the world where there is reliable data, but its something most politicians prefer to ignore when they have got their own snouts in the trough.
 

Shift Officer. Cannabis in its original form, used in moderation IS a beneficial herb. Moderation being the key word. What you are seeing is the effect of SKUNK which is genetically modified. It is far too strong and some strains do have a "toxic" effect. SKUNK CAN BE HARMFUL, especially to under 21's. The "old fashioned" herbal cannabis, organic, is LESS harmful than alcohol when used to excess. The original variety can be very helpful in coping with the emotional/mental distress caused by trauma and abuse. It helped me stay sane and put a smile on my face through some very grim times.
 

I think that nothing changes, much. The poorest still live in squalor so that those higher up the ladder can feel so much better about themselves.
Canada will remain the way it was even after this, unfortunately.
 

I have to take issue with James's comment about the Monarch, who commits NO "benefit fraud". The Queen and numerous members of the Royals work hard to serve this country. They do a valuable job which goes virtually unrecognised and unappreciated by the public, much like the police. The Monarchy are essential to this country and actually GENERATE a lot of revenue via tourism. They bring stability and balance to governance of this country, without which we would be vulnerable to fascist type regimes. GOD FORBID. And, incidentally, the members of the Royal family ARE chosen by God, born to a life of wealth but also personal sacrifice and service. The "common" people are relatively FREE citizens by comparison.

Ever heard the phrase "There but for the grace of God go I"? It applies to the Queen, her family and indeed ALL of us.
 

Well the Royals have clearly not been chosen by their subjects as we have not elected them. So now we are expected to believe they have been chosen by God instead. Which Monarch has been chosen by God Mr Anonymous?
Debretts has confirmed that Edward IV was illegitimate, and therefore every crowned English monarch after him is illegitimate. They say real King Michael of England lives in Australia. http://www.channel4.com/video/britains-real-monarch/series-1/episode-1/the-missing-link_p_1.html

Incidentally;
If the Unelected Royals really do attract tourists, why do democratic countries like France get far more foreign tourists than Britain. Is it because their Royal Palaces are all open to visitors?

What work do they do. We are told the Prime Minister benefits from Her Unelected Majesty the Queen's Valuable advice, but we are not told what advice that is. Did she advise Blair to illegally invade Iraq? Or are we expected to believe she only gives good advice, which he ignored?
 

James. You obviously have a fixed and narrow point of view which I cannot be arsed to argue about.
The Royal family have had a bad press over a number of years, by deliberate intent, by people with a spiteful and ignorant attitude.

I am not in a position to discuss the ins and outs of what Her Majesty did or did not advise BLiar to do. But what I DO know is that the "security service" made some mistakes, BIG ones!

We are "souls" incarnate in a "shell" which is our body. God decides WHO shall be born to who, where and what kind of life path they will have. As you will find out when you eventually pop your clogs! Until then, do have a nice life, and thank God if it's a good one, free from hassle and nit picking busy bodies.

The Royal family live in a "fishbowl" and Her Majesty IS still working at the age of 80.
She deserves some respect for a life of service to this country, as do the other working Royals. The grass really isn't greener James. They have very little privacy, which Diana highlighted, proved yet again by the inquest and every personal detail of her life reported by the press. She CERTAINLY deserved and deserves a LOT more respect than has been given to her.
There but for the grace of God go we all. But Diana is not their only victim. Is she?
 

If we go by who is born to whom then the real Monarch is not the illegitimate Queen Elizabeth but the legitimate King Michael, as confirmed by Debretts.
 

James. Have you never heard of fate and destiny. Queen Elizabeth didn't ask for the job, she found herself in it by birth and an abdication. I know nothing of the person Michael in the land of Oz who you claim is the rightful Monarch, which he is not.
Ever heard of "live and let live"?
Stop bitchin' please and be grateful that they are there doing the good that they do.
 

You admit you know nothing of King Michael, yet you still say he is not the rightful Monarch. At least follow the Channel 4 link and read it please. If there is anything you think Debretts have got wrong please let us know.
The proven fact is that the current bunch in Buck House are the descendants of an impostor who murdered his opponents. (and they are renting out our housing to their cronies and hangers on for far less than the market value) Who says crime doesn't pay?
 

James. You have totally missed the point of what I have said. Genetic "decendants" means NOTHING. That is just the body which HOUSES the SOUL of the person, incarnated by the will of God, The Supreme Being.
This Monarchy ARE there by Divine will and intention. End of.
 

You could say anything is the will of God, as some people do to justify all sorts of atrocities. But you don't know any more about God than I do. And I know nothing.
Please think about that honestly before replying.
 

James. You make some rather arrogant assumptions. Ignorance I can forgive, but arrogance is a pain in the ass. Having died once and landed at heavens gates, I DO know about God. End of.
 

You say 'End Of' as though a word from you terminates all discussion. And then you accuse someone else of arrogance ?
 

I'm under no obligation to discuss anything with you James, especially as you appear to be a nit-picker looking for an argument.
But please do forgive my irritation which you kistook for arrogance. Recalling the event of a rape induced heart attack at the age of 4 years old, which sent me to the gates of Heaven, is actually rather stressful....despite being revived to live my life in the FULL knowledge that God really does exist, and so do Angels.
Peace and Love.
 

.....and that should have read "mistook", silly me! ;0)
 

Watch the film on Sky TV called "IDIOCRACY"? Er, no can do as I cannot afford Sky TV on benefits because of ill health. I don't live in "luxury" as some of you cops, the press and the government seem to believe.
 

Don’t believe one optimistic word from any public figure about the economy or humanity in general. They are all part of the problem. Its like a game of Monopoly. In America, the richest 1% now hold 1/2 OF ALL UNITED STATES WEALTH. Unlike ‘lesser’ estimates, this includes all stocks, bonds, cash, and material assets held by America’s richest 1%. Even that filthy pig Oprah acknowledged that it was at about 50% in 2006. Naturally, she put her own ‘humanitarian’ spin on it. Calling attention to her own ‘good will’. WHAT A DISGUSTING HYPOCRITE SLOB. THE RICHEST 1% HAVE LITERALLY MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. Don’t fall for all of their ‘humanitarian’ CRAP. ITS A SHAM. THESE PEOPLE ARE CAUSING THE SAME PROBLEMS THEY PRETEND TO CARE ABOUT. Ask any professor of economics. Money does not grow on trees. The government can’t just print up more on a whim. At any given time, there is a relative limit to the wealth within ANY economy of ANY size. So when too much wealth accumulates at the top, the middle class slip further into debt and the lower class further into poverty. A similar rule applies worldwide. The world’s richest 1% now own over 40% of ALL WORLD WEALTH. This is EVEN AFTER you account for all of this ‘good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS from celebrities and executives. ITS A SHAM. As they get richer and richer, less wealth is left circulating beneath them. This is the single greatest underlying cause for the current US recession. The middle class can no longer afford to sustain their share of the economy. Their wealth has been gradually transfered to the richest 1%. One way or another, we suffer because of their incredible greed. We are talking about TRILLIONS of dollars. Transfered FROM US TO THEM. Over a period of about 27 years. Thats Reaganomics for you. The wealth does not ‘trickle down’ as we were told it would. It just accumulates at the top. Shrinking the middle class and expanding the lower class. Causing a domino effect of socio-economic problems. But the rich will never stop. They will never settle for a reasonable share of ANYTHING. They will do whatever it takes to get even richer. Leaving even less of the pie for the other 99% of us to share. At the same time, they throw back a few tax deductable crumbs and call themselves ‘humanitarians’. IT CAN’T WORK THIS WAY. This is going to end just like a game of Monopoly. The current US recession will drag on for years and lead into the worst US depression of all time. The richest 1% will live like royalty while the rest of us fight over jobs, food, and gasoline. Crime, poverty, and suicide will skyrocket. So don’t fall for all of this PR CRAP from Hollywood, Pro Sports, and Wall Street PIGS. ITS A SHAM. Remember: They are filthy rich EVEN AFTER their tax deductable contributions. Greedy pigs. Now, we are headed for the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time. SEND A “THANK YOU” NOTE TO YOUR FAVORITE MILLIONAIRE. ITS THEIR FAULT. I’m not discounting other factors like China, sub-prime, or gas prices. But all of those factors combined still pale in comparison to that HUGE transfer of wealth to the rich. Anyway, those other factors are all related and further aggrivated because of GREED. If it weren’t for the OBSCENE distribution of wealth within our country, there never would have been such a market for sub-prime to begin with. Which by the way, was another trick whipped up by greedy bankers and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. The credit industry has been ENDORSED by people like Oprah, Ellen, Dr Phil, and many other celebrities. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘good will’ BS. ITS A LIE. If you fall for it, then you’re a fool. If you see any real difference between the moral character of a celebrity, politician, attorney, or executive, then you’re a fool. WAKE UP PEOPLE. The 1% club will always say or do whatever it takes to get as rich as possible. Without the slightest regard for anything or anyone but themselves. Vioxx. Their idea. Sub-prime. Their idea. NAFTA. Their idea. Outsourcing. Their idea. The commercial lobbyist. Their idea. The multi-million dollar lawsuit. Their idea. $200 cell phone bills. Their idea. $200 basketball shoes. Their idea. $30 late fees. Their idea. $30 NSF fees. Their idea. $20 DVDs. Their idea. Subliminal advertising. Their idea. The MASSIVE campaign to turn every American into a brainwashed credit card, pharmaceutical, love-sick, celebrity junkie. Their idea. All of which concentrate the world’s wealth and resources and wreak havok on society. All of which have been CREATED AND ENDORSED by celebrities, athletes, and executives. IT MAKES THEM RICHER. So don’t fall for their ‘ good will’ ‘humanitarian’ BS. ITS A SHAM. NOTHING BUT TAX DEDUCTABLE PR CRAP. Bottom line: The richest 1% will soon tank the largest economy in the world. It will be like nothing we’ve ever seen before. and thats just the beginning. Greed will eventually tank every major economy in the world. Causing millions to suffer and die. Oprah, Angelina, Brad, Bono, and Bill are not part of the solution. They are part of the problem. EXTREME WEALTH HAS MADE WORLD PROSPERITY ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE. WITHOUT WORLD PROSPERITY, THERE WILL NEVER BE WORLD PEACE OR ANYTHING EVEN CLOSE. GREED KILLS. IT WILL BE OUR DOWNFALL. Of course, the rich will throw a fit and call me a madman. Of course, their ignorant fans will do the same. You have to expect that. But I speak the truth. If you don’t believe me, then copy this entry and run it by any professor of economics or socio-economics. Then tell a friend. Call the local radio station. Re-post this entry or put it in your own words. Be one of the first to predict the worst economic and cultural crisis of all time and explain its cause. WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE.
 

Quote: Recalling the event of a rape induced heart attack at the age of 4 years old, which sent me to the gates of Heaven, is actually rather stressful....despite being revived to live my life in the FULL knowledge that God really does exist: End Quote

Well I'm very sorry to hear that. But the fact that you are basing all this on your childhood dreams after a traumatic experience (why did your God let that happen?)instead of any fact, confirms what I thought. I dream lots of impossible things when I am asleep, and my memory of when I was aged 4 is far from reliable.
 

Thats a very long post. But I would differentiate between earned income, which is the incentive that drives the economy. And inherited income which tends to stifle the economy. as it reduces the incentive to work. The last few years has seen the Government further restrict building to force up property prices, and reduce inheritance tax, which has further increased the proportion of unearned income - which has to be offset by earned income. At the top of the pile is Her Unelected Majesty The Queen who stands as an example to us all - That however clever you are, and however hard you work, you will never be as well off as someone who has simply inherited their position. Is it any wonder we are falling further and further behind the truly Democratic countries?
 

James. My memories of abuse and other traumatic events were blocked out for most of my life. They returned bit by bit over the past few years, but I cannot say that I recall "everything" perfectly. But what I experienced was real enough and most certainly not a "dream". I had a lot of nightmares as a child, not lovely dreams, sadly.

You ask why did "my" God let that happen to me. Well, because I was chosen to "get" the bastard Beast that did that to me and countless other children. Job Done! And I guess, to inform others that heaven really does exist. I have nothing more to say on this matter now James. [That is if you even read this post]
Peace and Love.
 

Actually and factually, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth WAS "elected" by the Lord God Almighty, to be the supreme head of this state and the Church of England.